 |
"Photography is simply a function of noticing
things." —Elliott Erwitt
In the early 1990s, having been a full time
photographer for over 25 years, I began carrying a 35mm camera
with me at all times. Hardly a radical action, but given how
I was "raised" as a photographer—in the tradition of the large
format tripod mounted camera, it was a move that went somewhat
"against the grain" (if you'll pardon the expression). Photographing
was something that I had always done with deliberation and
sustained concentration, and a large and bulky camera. What
I began realizing was that I was missing a lot of pictures.
I was constantly seeing photographs I wanted to make, and
usually in situations where the thought of making photographs
was far from my mind—while driving the kids to school or doing
any number of day to day errands. In those circumstances it
would be impractical to have my camera gear with me and, even
if I did, impossible to take the time to stop and work.
So the idea was to use the small camera to make
a quick "sketch" of whatever it was that had caught my eye,
and subsequently make an effort to get back to the scene with
ample time and the big camera to "do it right". Seemed like
a good plan, but there were a couple of problems with it.
The first was that it was simply impossible to "get back to"
all the spots where I had jumped out of the car and quickly
"sketched". There were just too many of them. The second,
and more profound problem, was that when I did go back with
the view camera, even if the time of day was the same, the
light similar, and I was standing in the same spot, the picture
I had "sketched" before was nowhere to be found on the ground
glass. Something intangible was always missing. (Perhaps it
was nothing more than the spontaneity of the initial reaction,
an ingredient I've learned to trust and rely upon). This would
have been unbearably frustrating were it not for the realization
that I already had the picture I wanted-- on 35mm film exposed
"on the fly" with a hand held camera. How absurdly simple—why
go on looking for something I had already found? Another thought
suggested itself to me: the obvious, (though given my photographic
"upbringing", startling), realization that quantity
of negative has nothing to do with quality of seeing.
We are constantly surrounded by what the photographer Lou
Stouman eloquently referred to as "ordinary miracles" (the
title of one of his books). The Camera is a wonderful means
of bearing witness. Which particular camera doesn't really
matter.
The photographs in this exhibit and catalogue
were made with big cameras on tripods and small cameras handheld.
What they have in common is that they all point in a direction
to which I have always been drawn. It's perhaps best described
as a fascination with the mundane and the commonplace, which
for a moment, because of a quirk of the light, some momentary
whimsy or fleeting recognition, become, for lack of a better
word, beautiful. In such moments, Daly City, California (my
home) or Kanab, Utah become every bit as alluring and stimulating
as Paris or New York. And New York or Paris, in the myriad
and utterly ordinary masks they usually wear, can be every
bit as exotic as Kanab or Daly City.
Mark Citret
Spring, 2002
|